In this book there are examples of such calculations, which leave no room for doubts that it would be impossible to carry them out without knowing the essence … no, not of a conjecture, but of a much stronger statement called here “The Beal Theorem”! If the aim of the Beal Prize is really to get this impressive scientific discovery, then the organizing Committee in the face of "American Mathematical Society" would be easier do not rely on the propitiousness of mathematical editions, and just to request it directly from the author of this book.

This way would be clearly simpler and better since the proof of the Beal conjecture is too elementary and not so significant for science as the proof of the Beal Theorem, which would be much more useful, productive and impressive with the same end result that is required in conditions of the Beal Prize. The risk of arising another fake in this case will be excluded, but if nothing to be done to solve this problem, the initiator of the prize Mr. Andrew Beal may never wait to achieve his goal. Besides, it should be borne in mind that expert evaluation of the Beal conjecture proof does not require such obviously excessive precautions, because this task is for children from secondary school. What is written in this book is more than enough to make sure that this task has not any difficulties for the author.

It is very curious in this sense, how science will react to the appearance here of the FLT proof, performed by Fermat himself! And this is in conditions when as many as 18 (!!!) the most prestigious awards for obviously erroneous proof 1995 have already been presented! Of course, no one is immune from errors and we will show here how such pillars of science as Euclid and Gauss made the most elementary blunders in proving the Basic theorem of arithmetic, as well as Euler, who blessed the use in algebra of “complex numbers” , which are not numbers due to the fact that they do not obey to this same Basic theorem. However, Euler wasn’t aware of it yet, but his followers know this perfectly well for the two hundred years, nevertheless no one even had a finger stir to correct this mistake.

As for the not needed scientific discoveries, many people simply do not know that they can live quietly and consume all the vital resources they need only until the knowledge resource, accumulated in society for a given level of its development, will be exhausted. And after that, in order to keep what has been achieved, the stronger countries will attack the weaker ones and live at the expense of their plunder. But this would not have been necessary at all if these “strong” countries had enough knowledge. Then they would not have conflict with the rest of the world since all the necessary resources would be provided in abundance by science.

On this we will complete our introduction, but we will give it such a secret impulse that will allow us to perform a real wonder! … no, even two! We can call these wonders here by their proper names because our eternal opponents from the complete lack of real science by them, are simply incapable of this.

As a result, they will learn about the realization of the most grandiose technological breakthrough in Russia in the entire history of our civilization, with unlimited potential of development effectiveness for the immense future. The notorious “valleys”, “techno parks”, “incubators” and the like ghosts for such breakthroughs are unsuitable in principle. But still earlier, another wonder will happen when Russia literally in a couple of months, on the wreckage of collapsing today the world usury financial system, will create a new one, in which no any international money will be needed and all countries in international trade will use only their national currencies.

Are you again don't believe? Well, you can see for yourself because the book is in your hands!

Usually, the science's image is represented as an ordered system of knowledge about everything that can be observed in the world around us. However, this image is illusory and in fact there is not any orderliness in science since it is formed not by the development of knowledge from the simple to the complex, but only by the historical process of the emergence of new theories. The classic example is the Descartes – Fermat analytic geometry, where compared with Euclidean geometry, science sees only an analytic-friendly representation of numerical functions in a coordinate system, but does not evaluate the qualitative transition from naturalized elements (point, line, surface, etc.) to numbers.1

It would seem that this is so insignificant that it cannot have any consequences, but ironically, it was after the expansion of the numerical axis to the numerical plane, when science was hopelessly compromised, because it suddenly became clear that such a representation of numbers does not obey to the Basic theorem of arithmetic that the decomposing of an integer into prime factors is always unique. But then a corresponding conclusion should be made that no any numerical plane exists and everything connected with it should be written off to the archive of history.

But it’s really impossible! If there is no orderliness in science, then there is no reason to link new knowledge to earlier ones. Therefore, it is not at all news to the world of scientists that for the numerical plane the Basic theorem of arithmetic is not acted. This was known a century and a half ago and it never even occurred to anyone to abandon this idea. During this time, so much has been done that it’s so easily to take it all and throw away is in no way possible because many “experts” with their “scientific” research can lose their jobs and all monographs, reference books and textbooks on this theme will at once turn into tons of waste paper.2

Yes, not one of the scientists can be surprised by the fact that the Basic theorem of arithmetic is not acted, because they have already accustomed not only to such things. But they will be very surprised, when they know that nobody can prove BTA so far! All the “proofs” of this theorem in textbooks and on the Internet are either clearly erroneous or not convincing. But then it turns out that on the one hand, science deprives itself legitimacy since it does not recognize the Basic theorem, on which it itself holds, but on the other hand, it throughout all its history simply was not aware of the fact that it has no proof of this theorem.3

And what now to do? Can this blatant fact be perceived otherwise as the degradation of science in its very foundations? To some people such a conclusion may seem too categorical, but unfortunately for current science, this is even very mildly said. What a marvel, some theorem doesn’t act? And what about when the law of conservation of energy doesn’t act? Current astrophysics simply does not present itself without the “big bang theory”, according to which all the galaxies in the Universe are flowing away like fuzz. And such a crazy phantasmagoria is quite seriously presented today as one of the greatest "scientific" achievements, and fig leaves like "hidden energy" and "dark matter" easily cover the problems with the notorious conservation laws.

Against the background of the truly outstanding achievements of science there is no doubt that this virus of dark misfortune, which penetrated into its very foundations, could not have emerged from nothing and was clearly introduced from the outside. The malicious nature of the virus is disclosed by the fact that it always hides under the guise of "good intentions." And if that is so, then the task of getting rid of the misfortune is simplified because these are just the intrigues of the unholy, from which the real science always had sufficient reliable immunity.