Литмир - Электронная Библиотека
A
A

38. Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1998). Menstrual cycle variation in women’s preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265(1399), 927–933. doi:10.1098/­rspb.­1998.­0380; Havlicek, J., Roberts, S.C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1(3), 256–259. doi:10.1098/­rsbl.­2005.­0332; Scheib, J.E., Gangestad, S.W., & Thornhill, R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266(1431), 1913–1917. doi:10.1098/­rspb.­1999.­0866.

39. Johnston, V.S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M. et al. (2001). Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 251–267. doi:10.1016/­s1090-5138­(01)­00066-6; Penton-Voak, I.S., & Perrett, D.I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(1), 39–48. doi:10.1016/­s1090-5138­(99)­00033-1; Penton-Voak, I.S., Perrerr, D.I., Castles, D.L. et al. (1999). Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature, 399, 741–742. doi:10.1038/21557; Roney, J.R., & Simmons, Z.L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 14–19. doi:10.1016/­j.yhbeh.­2007.­09.008; Roney, J.R., & Simmons, Z.L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 14–19. doi:10.1016/­j.yhbeh.­2007.­09.008.

40. Feinberg, D.R., Debruine, L.M., Jones, B.C., & Little, A.C. (2008). Correlated preferences for men’s facial and vocal masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(4), 233–241. doi:10.1016/­j.evolhumbehav.­2007.­12.­008; Puts, D.A. (2006). Cyclic variation in women’s preferences for masculine traits. Human Nature, 17(1), 114–127. doi:10.1007/­s12110-006-1023-x.

41. Gangestad, S.W., Simpson, J.A., Cousins, A.J. et al. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15(3), 203–207. doi:10.1111/­j.0956-7976.­2004.­0150­3010.x; Lukaszewski, A.W., & Roney, J.R. (2009). Estimated hormones predict women’s mate preferences for dominant personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(3), 191–196. doi:10.1016/­j.paid.­2009.­02.­019.

42. Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M.G., & Fales, M.R. (2014). Supplemental material for do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1205–1259. doi:10.1037/­a0035438.

43. Larson, C.M., Haselton, M.G., Gildersleeve, K.A., & Pillsworth, E.G. (2013). Changes in women’s feelings about their romantic relationships across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 63(1), 128–135. doi:10.1016/­j.yhbeh.­2012.­10.­005; Meltzer, A.L. (2017). Wives with masculine husbands report increased marital satisfaction near peak fertility. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11(2), 161–172. doi:10.1037/­ebs0000083.

44. Simpson, J., Cantu, S., Griskevicius, V. et al. (2014). Fertile and selectively flirty: Women’s behavior toward men changes across the ovulatory cycle. Psychological Science, 25(2), 431–438. doi:10.1037/­e57819­2014-171.

45. Hasegawa, M., Arai, E., Watanabe, M., & Nakamura, M. (2008). Methods for correcting plumage color fading in the barn swallow. Ornithological Science, 7(2), 117–122. doi:10.2326/­1347-0558-7.2.117.

46. Kuo, P.X., Saini, E.K., Thomason, E. et al. (2015). Individual variation in fathers’ testosterone reactivity to infant distress predicts parenting behaviors with their 1-year-old infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 58(3), 303–314. doi:10.1002/­dev.21370.

47. McIntyre, M., Gangestad, S.W., Gray, P.B. et al. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men’s testosterone levels—but not always: The moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 642–651. doi:10.1037/­0022-3514.­91.­4.­642; Mazur, A., & Michalek, J. (1998). Marriage, divorce, and male testosterone. Social Forces, 77(1), 315. doi:10.2307/­3006­019.

48. Booth, A., & Dabbs, J.M., Jr. (1993). Testosterone and men’s marriages. Social Forces, 72(2), 463–477. doi:10.1093/­sf/­72.2.463; Gangestad, S.W., & Simpson, J.A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573–587. doi:10.1017/­s01405­25x­0000­337x; Gray, P.B., Parkin, J.C., & Samms-Vaughan, M.E. (2007). Hormonal correlates of paternal interactions: A hospital-based investigation in urban Jamaica. PsycEXTRA Dataset, 52(4), 499–507. doi:10.1037/­e616352011-205; Roney, J.R., Hanson, K.N., Durante, K.M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men’s faces: Women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273(1598), 2169–2175. doi:10.1098/­rspb.­2006.­3569; Anders, S.M., & Goldey, K.L. (2010). Testosterone and partnering are linked via relationship status for women and “relationship orientation” for men. Hormones and Behavior, 58(5), 820–826. doi:10.1016/­j.yhbeh.­2010.­08.­005.

49. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C.E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1576), 2023–2027. doi:10.1098/­rspb.­2005.­3112.

50. Rosen, M.L. & Lоpez, H.H. (2009). Menstrual cycle shifts in attentional bias for courtship language. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(2), 131–140.

51. Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C.E. (2005). Women’s sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1576), 2023–2027. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3112; Haselton, M.G., & Gangestad, S.W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49(4), 509–518. doi:10.1016/­j.yhbeh.­2005.­10.­006.

62
{"b":"689695","o":1}